Location:  Home » Religious Studies » Holy Terrors, Second Edition: Thinking About Religion After September 11  

Holy Terrors, Second Edition: Thinking About Religion After September 11

Holy Terrors, Second Edition: Thinking About Religion After September 11Author: Bruce Lincoln
Publisher: University Of Chicago Press
Category: Book

List Price: $15.00
Buy Used: $4.88
as of 7/30/2010 05:23 CDT details
You Save: $10.12 (67%)



New (15) Used (47) from $4.88

Seller: AZ Bargain Books
Rating: 3.0 out of 5 stars 4 reviews

Media: Paperback
Edition: 2
Pages: 190
Number Of Items: 1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.6
Dimensions (in): 8.9 x 6 x 0.6

ISBN: 0226482030
Dewey Decimal Number: 201.727
EAN: 9780226482033

Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days

Also Available In:

  • Paperback - Holy Terrors: Thinking about Religion after September 11
  • Kindle Edition - Holy Terrors, Second Edition: Thinking About Religion After September 11
  • Hardcover - Holy Terrors: Thinking about Religion after September 11

Similar Items:


Editorial Reviews:

Product Description
It is tempting to regard the perpetrators of the September 11th terrorist attacks as evil incarnate. But their motives, as Bruce Lincoln’s acclaimed Holy Terrors makes clear, were profoundly and intensely religious. Thus what we need after the events of 9/11, Lincoln argues, is greater clarity about what we take religion to be. 

Holy Terrors begins with a gripping dissection of the instruction manual given to each of the 9/11 hijackers. In their evocation of passages from the Quran, we learn how the terrorists justified acts of destruction and mass murder “in the name of God, the most merciful, the most compassionate.” Lincoln then offers a provocative comparison of President Bush’s October 7, 2001 speech announcing U.S. military action in Afghanistan alongside the videotaped speech released by Osama bin Laden just a few hours later. As Lincoln authoritatively demonstrates, a close analysis of the rhetoric used by leaders as different as George W. Bush and Osama bin Laden—as well as Mohamed Atta and even Jerry Falwell—betrays startling similarities. These commonalities have considerable implications for our understanding of religion and its interrelationships with politics and culture in a postcolonial world, implications that Lincoln draws out with skill and sensitivity. 

With a chapter new to this edition, “Theses on Religion and Violence,” Holy Terrors remains one of the essential books on September 11 and a classic study on the character of religion.

“Modernity has ended twice: in its Marxist form in 1989 Berlin, and in its liberal form on September 11, 2001. In order to understand such major historical changes we need both large-scale and focused analyses—a combination seldom to be found in one volume. But here Bruce Lincoln . . . has given us just such a mix of discrete and large-picture analysis.”—Stephen Healey, Christian Century

“From time to time there appears a work . . . that serves to focus the wide-ranging, often contentious discussion of religion’s significance within broader cultural dynamics. Bruce Lincoln’s Holy Terrors is one such text. . . . Anyone still struggling toward a more nuanced comprehension of 9/11 would do well to spend time with this book.”—Theodore Pulcini, Middle East Journal




Customer Reviews:
5 out of 5 stars A provocative analysis of religion in the contemporary world   July 2, 2009
DHW (Philadelphia, PA USA)
1 out of 1 found this review helpful

This is a wonderful little book that presents a thoughtful and provocative analysis of religion in the contemporary world. One of the writers who posted a review of this book on the Amazon site asserted that Lincoln argues that the rhetoric used by the leaders of Al-Qaeda and the leaders of the United States of America is quite similar. It seems to me that Lincoln actually takes great pains to point out the differences between the rhetoric used by the leaders of Al-Qaeda and the rhetoric used by the leaders of the United States of America.


4 out of 5 stars Required reading for the thoughtful American   November 6, 2006
Seth D. Clippard (Taichung, Taiwan)
3 out of 4 found this review helpful

Lincoln's work is an attempt to formulate a theory of religion. While his success on that front is open to criticism, he gives an impeccable presentation of the religious dimensions of the American/Arab/Christian/Muslim/politics debate. Anyone who wants to hone their understanding of 80% of front page news should read this. Besides it gives documented proof of why Falwell and Robertson should not be listened to...ever...about anything.


2 out of 5 stars A very tough slog   December 1, 2003
DTC# (ROP)
0 out of 2 found this review helpful

This is a difficult book to read because it is suffused with heavy academic jargon.

The author uses obtuse and arcane academic language to deconstruct speeches of George Bush and Osama bin Laden. The author ultimately "proves" that both Bush and bin Laden use the same essential rhetorical themes and devices to motivate and sway their target audiences. If one really hates Bush, this might prove cathartic, but IMO it is a silly argument because the same analytical technique could be applied to, say, FDR and Hitler.

The only redeeming quality of the book is a brief treatment of Sayyid Qutb and an even briefer treatment of the insanity following the French Revolution (e.g., "The Cult of Reason").

For the layperson, instead of this book I'd recommend Terror in the Mind of God: The Global Rise of Religious Violence, 3rd Edition (Comparative Studies in Religion and Society, Vol. 13) by Mark Juergensmeyer. It is far more accessible and IMO it provides a much more useful analysis and a broader survey. If you're looking to learn more about Sayyid Qutb and his influence on Islamic radicals, turn to Terror and Liberalism by Paul Berman.



1 out of 5 stars post-modern blather   July 9, 2008
Edgar Mcgarvey (Fall River, MA USA)
2 out of 7 found this review helpful

I noticed Lincoln's book only because of the similarity of it's title to that of a biography of Andy Wharhol that I read some time ago. Sadly, the book is the perfect example of the contemporary academic practice of working backward from a socio-anthropological conclusion to a tendentious definition that can only lead the innocent reader to buy into the author's political prejudices. Readers wishing an objective analysis of the comparative social functionality of Islam and Christianity should read the Epilog to Anthony Pagden's Peoples and Empires.



academic  biblical criticism  deconstruction  french revolution  islam